Pakistani YouTuber Ducky Bhai bail plea rejected in a high-profile online gambling case. The court cited his involvement in promoting illegal gambling platforms as the primary reason for denying bail, highlighting the serious legal consequences of endorsing such activities.
Introduction
In a significant legal development, Lahore’s judicial magistrate has rejected the bail plea of renowned Pakistani YouTuber Saad ur Rehman, popularly known as Ducky Bhai. The case revolves around allegations of promoting online gambling applications, leading to his arrest on August 17, 2025. This decision highlights the increasing scrutiny of influencers and their impact on societal norms.
Details of the Case
The National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) registered a case against Ducky Bhai under various sections of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), including:
Section 13: Electronic Forgery
Section 14: Electronic Fraud
Section 25: Spamming
Section 26: Spoofing
Section 294-B: Offering prize in connection with trade
Section 420: Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property
The charges stem from allegations that Ducky promoted several gambling applications, including Binomo, 1xBet, Bet365, and B9 Game, through his YouTube platform. The prosecution claims that these promotions led to financial losses for the public, with millions of rupees collected but profits withheld by the gambling platforms.
Join WhatsApp Channel For more Updates: PK Entertainment
Court Rationale for Rejecting Ducky Bhai Bail
During the bail hearing, the prosecution presented compelling evidence, including:
Electronic Devices: A laptop and two mobile phones recovered from Ducky Bhai contained voice chats with officials from Binomo, indicating active involvement in promoting the gambling application.
Financial Transactions: An amount of $326,420 was discovered in one of Ducky Bhai’s accounts, allegedly earned through the promotion of illegal apps.
Technical Reports: Investigative reports confirmed the presence of data linking Ducky Bhai to the promotion of banned gambling applications.
Magistrate Naeem Wattoo concluded that Ducky failed to provide a legitimate explanation for the recovered funds and did not deny his links with the gambling apps. The court emphasized that his actions had a significant impact on society, particularly among the youth who form a substantial part of his audience.
Also Read: Jimmy Kimmel Live Makes a Big Comeback to ABC on Tuesday Night After Suspension
Implications for Influencers & Society
This case serves as a stern reminder of the responsibilities that come with social media influence. Promoting illegal activities, even indirectly, can have far-reaching consequences. The court’s decision underscores the need for influencers to be aware of the legal implications of their endorsements and the potential harm they can cause to their followers.
Final Thoughts
The rejection of Ducky Bhai’s bail plea marks a significant moment in the intersection of social media influence and legal accountability. As the case progresses, it will undoubtedly set precedents for how similar cases are handled in the future. Influencers and content creators must now more than ever be vigilant about the content they promote and its potential legal ramifications.
