A Lahore court has postponed the hearing in the Ducky Bhai gambling case to October 2, 2025, after investigators said the probe is incomplete and asked for more time. The adjournment related to bail petitions filed by YouTuber Ducky Bhai (Saad-ur-Rehman) and his wife, Arooba Jatoi. Authorities — including the NCCIA and FIA — are compiling the investigation record.
Court adjournment
The Lahore court on September 29 adjourned proceedings until October 2, 2025, after the investigating officer requested extra time to complete the probe and file the full investigation record. The Additional Sessions Judge accepted the request and directed the National Crime Control and Investigation Agency (NCCIA) to submit the complete file at the next hearing.
Bail pleas status
The adjournment covered bail petitions filed by the accused. Reports say Ducky Bhai post-arrest bail and an interim bail application for his wife, Arooba Jatoi, were under consideration when the court paused proceedings. Earlier this month a magistrate had rejected a bail plea, and the YouTuber has been remanded while investigators continue evidence collection.
Allegations & the probe
Investigators allege that Ducky Bhai and other influencers promoted online gambling apps that were linked to alleged fraud and public financial losses. Agencies have seized devices and claim to be compiling digital evidence such as transaction records, promotional links and communications that may show how the apps were advertised. The probe involves both the NCCIA and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA).
Impact & Public Reaction
The case has generated strong public debate. Critics say influencers must be held accountable for promoting risky platforms, especially to young audiences. Supporters argue that promotion alone does not prove criminal intent and call for due process. Regulators and consumer groups are pressing for clearer rules on digital advertising and stronger consumer redress for alleged losses.
Key Facts of Ducky Bhai Gambling Case
- Next hearing date: October 2, 2025 (adjourned on Sept 29).
- Accused: Saad-ur-Rehman (known as Ducky Bhai) and Arooba Jatoi.
- Investigating agencies: NCCIA and FIA.
- Nature of case: Alleged promotion of online gambling apps linked to fraud and consumer losses.
Join WhatsApp Channel For more Updates: PK Entertainment
Legal context & Possible outcomes
If investigators present evidence linking promotional activity to organised fraud or licensed-free operations, the matter could move to trial and result in criminal charges depending on the court’s findings. Defence lawyers maintain that promotional posts, without proof of intent or direct involvement in fraud, may not meet the criminal threshold. The October 2 filing will shape procedural next steps — more remand, fresh charges or bail rulings.
Expanded background and timeline
The FIR and initial probe were reported after complaints that several influencers advertised betting links or apps that lacked local licences and, per affected users, facilitated fraudulent transactions. Law enforcement previously sought custodial remands to examine devices, servers and financial trails tied to the promotions. Investigators say they are still assembling technical and transaction records.
Also Read: Ducky Bhai Bail Plea Rejected in High-Profile Online Gambling Case
Statements from legal teams and agencies
Defence teams stress the presumption of innocence and call for careful analysis of digital evidence and intent. Investigative agencies say more time is required to analyse call logs, wallet transfers and promotional links — which is why the court granted a short adjournment to allow the NCCIA to file its records.
What to watch Next
Policymakers and regulators may use the case to tighten advertising rules for creators and clarify penalties for promoting unlicensed digital platforms. For readers, the most important short-term item is the NCCIA’s submission of Ducky Bhai on October 2 and any court action on bail or further remand. Watch whether the probe names additional influencers or produces forensic evidence tying promotions to measurable financial harm.
