The Samiya Hijab Harassment Case took a major turn as the court rejected the bail appeal of Hassan Zahid. He remains in custody facing charges of harassment and attempted abduction. Investigators continue to collect evidence, including electronic records and witness statements.
Case Background
The Samiya Hijab Harassment Case has become one of the most discussed legal matters in Islamabad. Social media influencer Samiya Hijab filed multiple complaints against Hassan Zahid, alleging harassment, threats, and an attempted abduction. According to her FIR, the accused had been stalking her for months, demanding marriage, and eventually tried to force her into his car outside her residence on 31 August 2025.
She further claimed Hassan snatched her phone, physically assaulted her, and issued life threats. Her medical examination report supported allegations of assault. The case quickly gained national attention, with calls for stronger legal protections for women and digital creators.
Court Proceedings & Bail Decisions
The case has been heard in the Islamabad District and Sessions Court under Judge Aamir Zia. Several FIRs were filed under multiple sections of the Pakistan Penal Code, including 354 (assault), 365 (kidnapping), 392 (robbery), 500 (defamation), and 509 (threats).
On 1 September 2025, bail was granted to Hassan Zahid in the abduction FIR against surety bonds of Rs20,000. The next hearing was fixed for 9 September 2025.
In a separate harassment and torture FIR, Hassan was sent on five days of physical remand, later extended by three more days. Police had sought eight days, but the court allowed three.
Defence lawyers argued that Hassan had already secured bail in one case, but was rearrested in another, which they claim amounts to harassment.
Evidence & Investigations
Police continue to collect and verify evidence to strengthen the case. Investigations include both physical recovery and forensic checks.
CCTV footage of the attempted abduction outside Samiya’s home.
Vehicle allegedly used in the crime, yet to be recovered.
Weapons said to be used for issuing threats.
Cash amount of Rs45,000 already recovered from Hassan during initial custody.
Mobile phone and digital records under forensic examination.
Defence Position
The defence claims that Hassan Zahid is being falsely implicated. His lawyers presented photographs of an alleged engagement ceremony, arguing that he and Samiya Hijab were once engaged, and that the FIRs are an attempt to damage his reputation.
They further allege that the multiple FIRs filed within a short span reflect malice, not justice. Hassan himself continues to deny all charges.
Court Remand Orders
Hassan was previously under a five-day physical remand in the threats/extortion FIR. That remand was extended by the prosecution request, and the court granted three more days in that remand.
For the kidnapping/abduction FIR, his bail was rejected and he was placed on judicial remand.
Defence counsel argued Hassan and Samiya Hijab had been engaged, presented photos of engagement, and asked the court to consider previous remand orders and evidence.
Also Read: Samiya Hijab Claims Injuries in Attempted Abduction
Public Reaction & Importance
The Samiya Hijab Harassment Case has sparked outrage across social media. Many users compared her situation to past tragedies, including the murder of Sana Yousaf, a teenage girl killed after rejecting a proposal.
Women’s rights groups and digital safety advocates stress that the case highlights serious issues:
Increasing threats faced by online creators.
Gaps in protection for women against harassment and abduction.
Need for faster police action and stronger digital forensics.
Final Thoughts
The rejection of Hassan Zahid bail appeal marks a decisive moment in the Samiya Hijab Harassment Case. By keeping the accused in custody, the court has signaled the seriousness of the charges and the need for a thorough investigation. With evidence recovery still pending and public attention growing, this case stands as a critical test of how Pakistan’s legal system addresses harassment and abduction threats against women and digital creators.
